I LOL every time I post this:mcsteven said:Hey Roadie - I think you said it - this first picture fits the "somebody covered their car in hot glue and drove through the JC Whitney catalog" or something like that.
I LOL every time I post this:mcsteven said:Hey Roadie - I think you said it - this first picture fits the "somebody covered their car in hot glue and drove through the JC Whitney catalog" or something like that.
Well, he's definitely handicapped.Blckshdw said:Actually it is. There are some stores and movie theaters down here that have handicapped spots sideways like that. I assume for wheel chair accessibility, or vehicles with wheel chair ramps.
Hatchet said:Hey I found a picture of the owner of the truck trying to fix up his van with some stick ons....
You don't even do that to a Ford. A 15 year old Civic or Corolla - sure. Maybe an 82 Buick. But not a somewhat recent BMW. I have no problems doing mods to a car like that, but really, they should be functional. I had a 74 BMW Bavaria (predecessor to the 5 series). All the mods outside of the passenger compartment I did were functional. But hey, he likely doesn't work for his money, so he has no appreciation for things.dmanns67 said:Someone should take his keys. That looks horrible. Its one thing if it is a Ford, Dodge, or Honda. You do not do that to a BMW
Is that a tornado front end?IllogicTC said:It's ugly but admittedly I appreciate the novelty of camper-gone-RV.
There's gotta be a way to report people like that.mcsteven said:Saw this today (30-APR-2014) while sitting in Starbucks. Cheap, stick on hood scoop. I've seen this guy before. Kills me. He's got this 7 series BMW, a Hummer H2, and he uses an EBT card. I know most people using EBT are NOT cheats, but I've seen this guy in these cars too many times for them to be clients or the boss's cars.
Looks like the front end of a 68 Toronado. That was the first year with the 455 cid / 375 hp motor. Perfect donor for an easy conversion since it was fwd. I want one! If you google Toronado, there were a few dual axle mods and one that was made into an 8 door bus/wagon.fletch09 said:Is that a tornado front end?
Saw a jeep wrangler with those a while back. Not a good look.Blckshdw said:I've seen a few cars with those around town here. Luckily they were girly cars to begin with. VW Bugs, or Cabrioles... I think I saw an older Exploder with some one time.
These would be the DBs that would heckle Roadie for putting Rubicon on his doorblazinlow89 said:I present.
"Duh, it's a Wrangler trim! They invented the name because it sounds rugged."HARDTRAILZ said:Why would you say that....
I am sure that dbag does not know what Rubicon is.
Maybe ok on a VW Beetle or PT Cruiser, but not a BMW.Black_tb said:this should be illegal i hate when i see a car like this
Yeah, too much. I like the sleepers. The exhaust tips are good if you've got a decent aftermarket exhaust. A friend and I did a lot of work to his CVPI when he had it. There was so much that came from the Mustang that carried right over to the CV it was easy. He then removed the side moldings and most of the emblems, gave it a nice dark red paint job, tinted the glass, and blacked the chrome. It was really fast. The CVPI wasn't known for it's acceleration, but this thing went. After I moved he rebuilt the motor and had it bottle fed. Updated the wheels to the LX lace ones. Tried to keep it as much of a sleeper as he could, but being from a small town, your car and it's reputation can get around. He put a little into it, and while the CVPI wasn't known for handling or acceleration or much, it was comfortable and was reliable for a long time.bmcutright said:
That discussion does make me miss my 94 Caprice 9C1 LT1 V8, spent more money on the tie rods and front end work than I did on the car itself ($1000 to the city auction). For being a land barge, that car had some giddy up, top end was 160MPH per the officers that drove it while it was in service. Digital speedometer went out on it too.mcsteven said:Maybe ok on a VW Beetle or PT Cruiser, but not a BMW.
Yeah, too much. I like the sleepers. The exhaust tips are good if you've got a decent aftermarket exhaust. A friend and I did a lot of work to his CVPI when he had it. There was so much that came from the Mustang that carried right over to the CV it was easy. He then removed the side moldings and most of the emblems, gave it a nice dark red paint job, tinted the glass, and blacked the chrome. It was really fast. The CVPI wasn't known for it's acceleration, but this thing went. After I moved he rebuilt the motor and had it bottle fed. Updated the wheels to the LX lace ones. Tried to keep it as much of a sleeper as he could, but being from a small town, your car and it's reputation can get around. He put a little into it, and while the CVPI wasn't known for handling or acceleration or much, it was comfortable and was reliable for a long time.
Those Caprices were pretty dang fast, too. From what I always saw, they easily bested the CVPI on acceleration, about the same on handling, but that Ford simply lasted everything else. Love how everyone wants one because of the way they were maintained. Horse hockey! They want it because it says "Police Interceptor" on the back. At least that's why I wanted one.bmcutright said:That discussion does make me miss my 94 Caprice 9C1 LT1 V8, spent more money on the tie rods and front end work than I did on the car itself ($1000 to the city auction). For being a land barge, that car had some giddy up, top end was 160MPH per the officers that drove it while it was in service. Digital speedometer went out on it too.
The early 90s Beretta digital cluster wasn't all that bad. Provided a "bar graph" style gauge system, with a numerical readout on the speedometer in addition to the graph. It was easily switchable between imperial and metric units (changing which numbers lit up next to the bar graph and providing the appropriate numerical readout), the gauges to the left would blink their symbol if there was an issue, and the info center on the right offered things like calculated fuel range, instant and average MPG, and a digital readout of the tachometer. It was pretty novel.mcsteven said:Those Caprices were pretty dang fast, too. From what I always saw, they easily bested the CVPI on acceleration, about the same on handling, but that Ford simply lasted everything else. Love how everyone wants one because of the way they were maintained. Horse hockey! They want it because it says "Police Interceptor" on the back. At least that's why I wanted one.
I can't stand any digital gauges. The only digital one to me that's ok is the heater/ac. I remember the early 80's T-Bird (maybe the late 70's). Those gauges sucked and I don't think I've seen any, ever, that I like. Just my not so humble opinion.
Hence why no one touches my truck.IllogicTC said:and make sure anyone taking a tool to your vehicle has some competence!
Holy shit. That's more rare than a Big Foot sighting. That looks like one of the octo-exhaust, twin S&M (spoiler & money) turbo Honda prototypes. Most were sent to the crushers.Mirage said:ImageUploadedByTapatalk1400931504.108671.jpg
Saw this the other day. Just because Walmart sells stick on/bolt on accessories doesn't mean you have to buy all of them. The Canada flags on the trunk give us Canadians a bad name.