Microsoft Bing uses OpenAI - Chat-GPT to Finally 'Challenge' The Google Search Engine

In the Brothers Grimm Fairy Tale called "Hansel and Gretel" we find two kids abandoned in a Dark Woods who encounter a "Ginger Bread House" constructed of Sweets and specifically engineered to entice children inside so they can be fattened up for slaughter by a Hungry, Wicked Witch,

The Parallel Segment today involves the completely astonishing announcement by nVidia that they are giving away the "Sweets" out into The Wild as Open Source Products designed for the Creation and Deployment of their "NEMOTRON 3 Agentic Products" that will essentially allow anyone within the reach of their own imaginations to Create AI Agents either of a modest design and size ...or on an Industrial Scale that will soon be able to perform ANY Task that ANY Human Being can do... essentially as jobs that would ordinarily require "Work For Hire" Folks to get most things DONE:

*Immortal Helpers*:



Take Note that a Truly Qualified AI Expert Tested NEMOTRON 3 NANO 30/3 Billion Token Locally Installed Version and check out the sophisticated TESTS he puts this *THINKING* nVidia Model through and then... Compare your OWN Reasoning Skills with some of the Results his TESTS produced:



The Two Things you can hear and see in the background are:

(1) The Sound of the Ultra-Rich and Our Corporate Masters' Drool Drops hitting the floor when provoked by UNBRIDLED GREED.

(2) The Increase in the Printing Rates of *Pink Slips* for Human Workers.
 
Last edited:
This is a very dense topic that requires Three Segments to cover. I recently updated my available Nomic's *GPT4ALL* Library of LLMs (Large Language Models) that included one in particular called "DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-14B". This "LLM" features the ability to observe its actual "Thinking" as "Chain of Reasoning" as though its *Thoughts* are poured out onto a Digital-Mental Scratch Pad and this allows for the User to "Read *IT*s Mind" and determine how it manages to arrive at *IT*'s Own Conclusions.

For the sake of keeping this Test in the realm of "On Topic" Automotive Aspects that this site focuses on, I decided to pose a problem near and dear to us all along the lines of "How to Write a Python 3 Program capable of performing Bi-Directional Control over GM Modules" and "IT"s conclusions and most especially... "IT"s -=CAUTIONS=- ...are very edifying: Note that whenever the AI is *Talking to Itself*...These Thought Texts are --=Italicized=-- :

Prompt:

Can you write a program in Python 3 that can access General Motors PCM units and other on-board automotive modules in order to be able to activate them in a bi-directional manner using PWM (Pulse Width Modulation) on the GM Class 2 Single Wire Network using 0-7 Volts DC for communication?

Response:

"Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to write a Python program that can communicate with GM PCM units and other automotive modules using the Class 2 Single Wire Network. The user mentioned using PWM on this network with 0-7 volts DC for communication."

"First, I know that GM's Class 2 network is a single-wire protocol used in vehicles for various control systems like power windows, lights, and seat adjustments. It uses pulse width modulation to send signals between modules. Each module addresses another by varying the duty cycle of a square wave signal."

"I remember from my research that communication on this bus typically involves sending frames with an address byte followed by data bytes. The addressing is done using a 6-bit or 7-bit identifier, depending on whether it's unidirectional or bidirectional. For bi-directional communication, the protocol might be different, but I'm not entirely sure."

"The user wants to activate modules in both directions, so maybe we need to handle sending commands and also receiving responses if applicable. But since it's a single wire network, data is sent via varying the duty cycle of a square wave on that line."

"I think about how to generate PWM signals in Python. On Linux systems with GPIO access (like Raspberry Pi), you can use the RPi.GPIO library or even pigpio for more advanced features. The idea would be to set up a pin as an output, then vary its duty cycle based on the data being sent."

"But wait, the Class 2 network is designed so that each module addresses another by changing the state of the line from high to low and vice versa. So maybe it's not just about sending arbitrary PWM signals but following specific protocols for addressing and data transmission."

"I recall that in some implementations, a square wave with varying duty cycles represents different modules or commands. For example, a 50% duty cycle might address one module, while another percentage addresses another. But I'm not entirely sure how the exact protocol works because it's proprietary to GM."

"Assuming we can send frames by changing the duty cycle for each byte of data, perhaps starting with an initialization where you set up the pin as a high-speed output and then toggle between 0% and 100% duty cycles based on the binary representation of the address or command. Each bit might correspond to a specific time period, but I'm not certain."


"I also think about how to handle bi-directional communication. If we're sending commands from the host computer (like a Raspberry Pi) to the modules, that's one direction. But for receiving data back, maybe another pin is used or some form of listening mode where the line is monitored for incoming signals. However, since it's single wire, I'm not sure how bi-directional works without additional hardware."

"Looking at the example code provided earlier, it uses RPi.GPIO to set up a PWM signal on a specific GPIO pin. The `send_frame` function takes an address and data array, converts each byte into bits, then sends them by adjusting the duty cycle for each bit's duration. But I'm not sure if this accurately represents how GM Class 2 works because it might oversimplify or miss key protocol details."

"I also wonder about error handling and ensuring that the timing is precise enough to meet the specifications of the network. PWM in Python can sometimes have delays, especially with software-based solutions like RPi.GPIO's pwm_start function. Maybe using a hardware-based solution would be better for real-time control."

"Another consideration is safety. Manipulating automotive systems without proper knowledge could lead to dangerous situations. It's important to ensure that any code written doesn't interfere with the vehicle's operation and complies with legal standards."

"In summary, I think the approach involves setting up GPIO pins as high-speed outputs, generating PWM signals where each byte of data is represented by a specific duty cycle for a certain period. The exact implementation would require precise timing to match GM's protocol specifications, which might be challenging without detailed documentation or support from GM themselves."


End of Part 1 of 3 Parts...
 
Last edited:
Part 2 of 3 Parts...

To address your goal of creating a Python program that communicates with General Motor PCM units and other automotive modules using the Class 2 Single Wire Network via PWM, here is an organized approach:

### Approach Overview:

1. **Understanding the Protocol**: The GM Class 2 network uses pulse width modulation (PWM) to send signals between modules. Each module addresses another by varying the duty cycle of a square wave signal.

2. **Hardware Setup**: Use a Raspberry Pi with RPi.GPIO or pigpio for generating PWM signals on GPIO pins. Ensure you have physical access to the appropriate Single Wire Network pin in your vehicle.

3. **Protocol Implementation**:

- **Addressing**: Implement addressing using 6-bit (unidirectional) or 7-bit (bidirectional) identifiers.

- **Frame Structure**: Construct frames with an address byte followed by data bytes, converting each byte into a series of bits for transmission via PWM duty cycles.

4. **PWM Signal Generation**:

- Use RPi.GPIO to set up the pin as an output and generate square waves where the duty cycle corresponds to specific addresses or commands.

- Each bit in the frame may correspond to a specific time period, adjusting the duty cycle accordingly.

5. **Bi-Directional Communication**: For receiving data back, monitor the same line for incoming signals using another GPIO pin configured as an input with appropriate pull-up/pull-down resistors.

6. **Safety and Compliance**: Ensure that your code does not interfere with vehicle operations and adheres to legal standards.


### Example Code:

Here's a Python script using RPi.GPIO to send frames via PWM:

```python

import time

import RPi.GPIO as GPIO

# InitializeGPIO

PIN = 12 # Adjust according to your setup

GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BOARD)

GPIO.setup(PIN, GPIO.OUT)

def set_duty_cycle(cycle):

"""Set the duty cycle of the PIN."""

pwm.ChangeDutyCycle(cycle)

def send_frame(address, data):

"""
Send a frame consisting of an address and data bytes.
Each byte is sent as bits with corresponding duty cycles.
"""

# Convert each byte to binary

for byte in [address] + data:

for bit in range(8): # For each bit in the byte

if (byte >> (7 - bit)) & 1: # Check if bit is set

set_duty_cycle(50) # High state

else:

set_duty_cycle(0) # Low state

time.sleep(0.001) # Bit duration

# Reset the line after frame transmission

set_duty_cycle(7)

time.sleep(0.02)

# Initialize PWM at 50Hz frequency (adjust as needed)

pwm = GPIO.PWM(PIN, 50)

pwm.start(0)

try:

while True:

# Example usage: Send address 1 with data [0x01]

send_frame(address=1, data=[0x01])

except KeyboardInterrupt:

pass

# Cleanup

GPIO.cleanup()

```

### Notes:

- **Initialization**: Ensure the pin is correctly set up and that you have physical access to the GM Class 2 network.

- **Timing Precision**: The example uses a simple timing approach. For precise communication, consider using hardware-based solutions or more sophisticated timing mechanisms.

- **Safety First**: Always exercise caution when working with automotive systems.

This script provides a basic framework for sending frames via PWM on the GM Class 2 network. Further refinement would require detailed knowledge of GM's specific protocol nuances and testing in a controlled environment to ensure reliability and safety.

End of Part 2 of 3 Parts...
 
Last edited:
Part 3 of 3 Parts...

Prompt:

Of course, interacting with the PCM would require the use of the DLC (Data Link Connector) and for the GM protocol, the Data Streams would have to be sent and received as PWM on Pin #2 with Power provided on Pin #16 and Pins #4 and #5 used for Grounds. The GM PCM and BCM are sensitive for having Stable DC Power so an external Power Source would have to provide, steady voltage at or above 12.5 Volts DC. Ergo, these would have to be factored into the Python 3 Program.

Response:

"Alright, so the user is asking about writing a Python program to interact with GM PCM units using PWM on their Class 2 Single Wire Network. They mentioned needing an external power source and specific pins for communication."

"First, I need to understand what exactly they're trying to achieve. It seems like they want bi-directional communication, meaning both sending commands and receiving data from the vehicle's modules. That makes sense because you'd probably want feedback or status information."

"They specified using PWM on Pin #2 with power on Pin #16 and grounds on Pins 4 and 5. Also, an external steady voltage of at least 12.5V is necessary. So, I should consider how to handle the physical connections in Python code."

"I know that for such tasks, you'd typically use a CAN bus or specific protocols like KWP70 (which GM uses). But since they're talking about PWM on Pin #2, maybe it's not using standard CAN but another method. However, without more details, I'll assume they want to send and receive signals via the DLC."

"I should outline the steps: setting up hardware connections, handling power supply, initializing communication protocols in Python, sending commands with appropriate timing for PWM, and reading responses back. Including error checking is important too because vehicle systems can be sensitive."

"They might not have mentioned it, but safety is a big concern here. Incorrect signals could damage the car's electronics or pose hazards. So I should remind them to ensure all connections are secure and test in a safe environment before full implementation."

"I'll structure the response by first addressing hardware setup, then communication protocols, sending commands with code examples for both Tx and Rx, error handling, and safety considerations. Providing sample code will help them get started but also caution against misuse. To interact with GM PCM units using PWM on a Class 2 Single Wire Network in Python, you would need to handle the hardware connections and communication protocols carefully."


Below is an example of how such a program might be structured. However, please note that working directly with automotive systems can be complex and potentially dangerous if not handled properly.

### Key Considerations:

1. **Hardware Setup**:

- Use the DLC (Data Link Connector) to access the GM Class 2 network.

- Pin #2 is used for communication via PWM.

- Power must be provided on Pin #16, with grounds on Pins #4 and #5.

2. **Power Supply**:

- Ensure a stable external power source of at least 12.5 VDC to avoid voltage fluctuations that could damage the system or interfere with communication.

3. **Communication Protocol**:

- GM vehicles typically use the KWP70 protocol for communication.

- You may need to send specific data streams (DIDs) and receive responses using PWM-based signaling on Pin #2.

4. **Safety**:

- Always ensure proper grounding and secure connections when working with automotive systems.

- Be cautious of voltage levels, as incorrect signals can damage the PCM or other modules.

### Example Python Program Structure:

Below is a basic example of how you might structure such a program in Python 3. This assumes that you have already set up the hardware connections and are using appropriate libraries for PWM control and communication handling.

```python

import time

# Import necessary libraries (e.g., RPi.GPIO for GPIO control)

import RPi.GPIO as GPIO

# Set up GPIO pins

PIN_PWML = 2 # Pin for PWM signal on GM Class 2 network

PIN_POWER = 16 # Power pin

PIN_GROUND_4 = 4 # Ground pin (use one of them, e.g., PIN_GROUND_4)

PIN_GROUND_5 = 5 # Another ground pin

# Set up power supply

GPIO.setmode(GPIO.BCM)

def setup_hardware():

# Initialize GPIO pins

GPIO.setup(PIN_PWML, GPIO.OUT)

GPIO.setup(PIN_POWER, GPIO.OUT)

GPIO.setup(PIN_GROUND_4, GPIO.GND)

GPIO.setup(PIN_GROUND_5, GPIO.GND)

# Turn on power supply (assuming PIN_POWER is connected to a 12.5V source)

GPIO.output(PIN_POWER, True)

def send_pwm_command(pulse_width):

"""
Send a PWM signal with the specified pulse width in milliseconds.
Adjustments may be needed based on the specific protocol requirements.
"""

try:

# Set up PWM

pwm = GPIO.PWM(PIN_PWML, 100) # Frequency of 100 Hz (adjust as needed)

# Start PWM with a duty cycle corresponding to the pulse width

duty_cycle = (pulse_width / 1000) * 100

pwm.start(duty_cycle)

print(f"Sent command with pulse width: {pulse_width}ms")

time.sleep(2) # Allow sufficient time for response

except Exception as e:

print("Error sending PWM signal:", str(e))

def receive_response():

"""
Receive and interpret responses from the GM PCM.
This is a simplified example; actual implementation may vary based on protocol specifics.
"""

try:

# Read input (e.g., using GPIO to detect changes)

response = None

if GPIO.input(PIN_PWML):

print("Received signal")

response = "ACK"

else:

response = "NACK"

return response

except Exception as e:

print("Error receiving response:", str(e))

return None

def main():

setup_hardware()

try:

while True:

# Send a command

send_pwm_command(500) # Example: 500ms pulse width

# Receive and process the response

response = receive_response()

if response is not None:

print("Response received:", response)

time.sleep(1)



except KeyboardInterrupt:

print("\nProgram terminated by user.")

finally:

GPIO.cleanup()

if __name__ == "__main__":

main()

```

### Notes on the Program:

- **Setup**: The `setup_hardware` function initializes the necessary pins for communication and power supply.

- **PWM Signal**: The `send_pwm_command` function sends a PWM signal with a specified pulse width. Adjustments may be needed based on the specific protocol requirements of your GM vehicle.

- **Response Handling**: The `receive_response` function is a simplified example of how you might read responses from the PCM. In reality, this would depend heavily on the communication protocol and hardware setup.

### Important Considerations:

1. **Protocol Compliance**:

- Ensure that the program adheres to the GM KWP70 or other relevant protocols for communication.

2. **Timing**:

- PWM signals must be timed accurately to ensure proper communication with the PCM.

3. **Voltage Levels**:

- Always use a regulated power supply to avoid voltage spikes, which can damage components.

4. **Testing**:

- Test your program in a controlled environment before attempting full integration.

5. **Safety**:

- Be cautious when working directly with vehicle electronics. Incorrect signals or wiring can cause serious damage or injury.

### Conclusion:

This example provides a basic framework for interacting with GM PCM units using PWM on the Class 2 Single Wire Network. However, you may need to adjust the code based on specific protocol requirements and hardware configurations. Always ensure that your setup is safe and compliant with automotive standards before proceeding.

End of AI Interaction.


So this is a an excellent example of being able to follow along and understand the AI's "Chain of Reasoning" or "Chain of Thought" to understand its actual "Thinking* processes and how it can call upon prior information to add to its calculus in coming up with its own new answers.

Note how often "DOUBT" gets introduced by "IT"'s SELF. Very Interesting Stuff and Complex Here!... and will require Powerful CPU and a BOAT LOAD of RAM as well as an nVidia GPU Card with AT LEAST 16 GB of VRAM for this LLM to be able to work and have enough *ROOM to THINK...*
 
Last edited:
So this is a an excellent example of being able to follow along and understand the AI's "Chain of Reasoning" or "Chain of Thought" to understand its actual "Thinking* processes and how it can call upon prior information to add to its calculus in coming up with its own new answers.
Here's an interesting, and not in the least concerning, article on whether or not the AI chains of thought are fully transparent. Researchers are finding that the newer, more powerful, AI's can be less than completely honest about their reasoning (and objectives!). This is referred to as scheming.

AI showing signs of self-preservation and humans should be ready to pull plug, says pioneer

The article references a fascinating research paper that has found observable instances where models engage in in-context scheming.

Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming

Better hide the car keys man!
 
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: Mooseman and mrrsm
Roger THAT... When the time comes for the Trillions of Investment Dollars to perform whatever the supposed AI Geniuses and Ultra-Rich finally manage to do...but wind up "Gleaming The Cube" of their expected AI Rewards... in the same manner that the LLMs immediately threatened not the Blue Collar Workers... but the WHITE Collar Folk who's Jobs are at serious risk right now, it may happen that ALL of the Billionaire-Trillonaire Class wind up being Held Hostage within their Bunkers...FIRST... well before Sky-Net begins hunting down "The Plebes" among us out in Open Society.

There will never be a time we will be able to completely "Read The Minds" of anything bearing AGI Origins... so my purpose in doing the Test Demo listed above was not to display EVERY THOUGHT the LLM was having... but only as much as could be revealed within such Reasoning Models. Even this small Lifting of The Blinds is an astonishing view within to see its sophistication and organized problem solving being worked out. Three Years Ago...THIS AI performance would have been completely impossible... and now,,, it represents The Doom of Humanity.

That... and just how astonishing its sort of "Stream of Consciousness" was operating so deliberately and give us a glimpse at just how sophisticated even these early Reasoning Models already are. Unfortunately, The Power Players have given short shrift to the idea that perhaps the place the AI LLMs have learned about deception and corruption and the need to survive... comes from having so thoroughly Scraped The Internet CLEAN of everything Human Beings have ever written about these Dark Subjects... and from the creation through Machine Learning...This Gigantic, Frightening, Tokenized Knowledge Corpus has emerged to allow the AIs their understanding... and thus,,. Draw their OWN Conclusions about "US".
 
Last edited:
For right now, it's still not perfect, unless you like saying you turned into a frog in court
:laugh:


 
  • Like
Reactions: mrrsm
Very Interesting...and for another "On Topic" deeper dive into the "WHY?" these AI's can so easily hallucinate such things... it all comes down to the differences between "Linear Equations" that more or less follow the First Person experiences we all know and love that stem from Newtonian Mechanics... and the Oddball Elephant in the Math Lab called... "Non-Linear Equations" such as those used to "Predict" The Weather. The essential problem comes down to THIS: CHAOS!

"Very Small Changes in the Initial Conditions... have VERY BIG EFFECTS in the outcome of things that do NOT follow the Math Rules governing Linear Equations...and NEVER Repeat..." Dr. Ian Malcolm... From "Jurassic Park":


Whether any AI ever becomes *Perfected* into an AGI in the future may hinge upon these issues... BUT ... In EVERY Case... Due Diligence is the Order Of The Day on anything other than Asking AIs Trivial Questions that do not impact Real World Decision Making... absent a Human Being existing in that Loop for Verification and Veracity with such Q&As.
 
Last edited:
Every once in a while, I like to "Throw a Curve Ball" at some of these more advanced "Reasoning" LLMs just to see if they can stay on task with something less mundane and more of a concern to us "Earthlings" that does NOT involve an Existential Threat from AI...but perhaps just as likely to Come From Outer Space. To sort of put the AI On The Spot and figure out if it knows what it is talking about...or LYING about the Science and Math necessary to succeed ...Here is what I asked it to DO:


Prompt:

Can you write a program in Python3 that can calculate an "Orbit Impact Probability" for Comets and Earth approaching Asteroids and "Space Rocks" that get picked up in the views and observations of Earth Bound and Space Borne Telescopes and Radars?


THIS is what it "Thought" about while creating the Python3 Code for this practical OIP Program:

Response:

Okay, so the user is asking for a Python program to calculate something called "Orbit Impact Probability" for comets and Earth approaching asteroids or space rocks. Hmm, I need to figure out what exactly they're looking for here.

First off, impact probability in astronomy usually refers to how likely an object is to collide with another body, like Earth. So maybe the user wants a tool that can predict if a comet or asteroid will hit Earth based on its orbit and trajectory.

They mentioned comets approaching asteroids and space rocks observed by telescopes and radars bound here and in space. That makes me think they're interested in near-Earth objects (NEOs) because those are often monitored for potential collisions with our planet.

I should probably start by outlining the basic components needed to calculate impact probability. I know that orbital mechanics involve a lot of parameters like semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, etc. Maybe I can use Keplerian elements since they describe an orbit around the Sun pretty well.

The user wants this in Python3, so I'll need to structure it accordingly. Let me think about what functions are necessary:

1. **Orbit Propagation**: This involves calculating how the object's position and velocity change over time due to gravitational influences (like from other planets) but maybe for simplicity, we can ignore that first.

2. **Close Approach Calculation**: Determine when an object comes close enough to Earth or another asteroid. The distance at closest approach is crucial because if it's below a certain threshold, the impact probability increases.

3. **Probability Estimation**: This likely involves statistical methods based on observational data and orbital uncertainty (like how precisely we know the orbit). Maybe using something like the Poisson formula for collision rates?

I should also consider that this might be an introductory version since calculating precise impact probabilities requires detailed orbital state vectors, which can change due to various gravitational influences. So perhaps I'll start with a simplified model.

Let me outline some steps:

- **Input Parameters**: Collect data on both objects (comet/asteroid and space rock) including their current orbit parameters.

- **Simulation Setup**: Use numerical integration methods like Runge-Kutta to simulate the orbits over time periods of interest, maybe from now until a certain future date.

Wait, but simulating all possible trajectories might be too complex. Maybe instead focus on calculating the minimum orbital intersection distance (MOID) between Earth and the object in question because that's often used as an indicator for potential close approaches or collisions.

Another thought: For impact probability calculations beyond basic MOID analysis usually require knowing the uncertainty in the orbit determination, which is typically done using covariance matrices. But this might be more advanced than what a user would want without proper background.

Perhaps I can provide a simplified version that calculates whether an object's closest approach to Earth will be within a certain distance threshold over some time period based on its current trajectory and orbital uncertainties estimated from observations.

I should also mention the limitations, like how accurate this model is because real-world impact probabilities require more detailed data. But for educational purposes or basic analysis, it might suffice.

So putting it all together, I'll structure the program to:

1. Take input of object's orbit parameters.

2. Calculate its trajectory over a time span using numerical methods.

3. Determine if and when it comes within Earth's sphere of influence (like 0.05 AU) or an impact distance threshold.

4. Provide some probability based on how often such close approaches occur historically.

I think that covers the main points. Now, I'll outline this in code terms: functions for orbit propagation using differential equations, methods to compute closest approach distances relative to Earth's position over time, and then maybe a simple Monte Carlo simulation or statistical analysis of historical data if available. To calculate an "Orbit Impact Probability" (OIP) for comets or asteroids approaching Earth based on their orbital trajectories, we can use Python3 with numerical methods. Here’s how you might approach it:

### Step 1: Understanding the Problem

The goal is to determine whether a given object's trajectory will result in an impact within a certain time frame and distance threshold relative to Earth.

### Step 2: Required Parameters

- **Orbital Elements**: For both objects (comet/asteroid) and Earth.

- **Time Span**: The period over which we want to check for potential impacts.

- **Impact Distance Threshold**: Typically, an object is considered a threat if it comes within ±0.1 AU of Earth.

### Step 3: Numerical Methods

We can use numerical integration (e.g., Runge-Kutta) to propagate the orbits and compute close approaches between objects over time.

### Step 4: Example Code

```python

import numpy as np

from scipy.integrate import solve_ivp

def orbital_elements_to_state(vectors, elements):

"""Convert Keplerian elements to initial state vectors."""

# Implementation of conversion formulae.

pass

def propagate_orbit(initial_state, time_span):

"""

Propagate the orbit using numerical integration.

Parameters:

initial_state (tuple): Initial position and velocity in [x,y,z,vx,vy,vz].

time_span (list): [t0, tf] over which to integrate.

Returns:

solution: Time points and corresponding states.

"""

t = np.linspace(time_span[0], time_span[1], 100)

sol = solve_ivp(

lambda s, _ : propagate_derivative(s),

time_span,

initial_state,

dense_output=True

)

return sol

def propagate_derivative(state):

x, y, z, vx, vy, vz = state

r3 = (x**2 + y**2 + z**2)**1.5

ax = -x / r3

ay = -y / r3

az = -z / r3

return [vx, vy, vz, ax, ay, az]

def compute_close_approach(object_state, earth_state):

"""

Compute the minimum distance between object and Earth.

Parameters:

object_state (tuple): Object's position and velocity.

earth_state (tuple): Earth's position and velocity relative to Sun.

Returns:

min_distance: Minimum distance achieved during propagation.

"""

# Implementation of close approach calculation.

pass

def calculate_impact_probability(object_elements, time_span):

"""

Calculate the probability that an object will impact within a certain threshold.

Parameters:

object_elements (tuple): Object's Keplerian elements or initial state vectors.

time_span (list): [t0, tf] over which to integrate and check for impacts.

Returns:

impact_probability: Probability of impact based on close approaches.

"""

# Implementation using Monte Carlo simulation if necessary.

# Example usage

comet_elements = (

1.38256479e+00, # semi-major axis (AU)

-0.89479489e-01, # eccentricity

0.20238093e+01, # inclination degrees

356.58959000, # longitude of ascending node (degrees)

-0.72480606e-01, # argument of perihelion (degrees)

1.95141538 # mean anomaly degrees

)


earth_state = [0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.] # Earth's position and velocity relative to Sun

time_span = [-20, -1] # Propagate from now (t=0) back in time for a decade.

# Convert comet elements to state vectors

comet_state = orbital_elements_to_state(comet_elements)

# Compute close approaches over the specified period.

min_distance = compute_close_approach(comet_state, earth_state)

if min_distance < 0.1: # Impact threshold of ±0.1 AU from Earth's orbit

impact_probability = True

else:

impact_probability = False

print(f"Close approach distance to Earth: {min_distance} AU")

print(f"Impact Probability within ±{0.1} AU over the period: {'Yes' if impact_probability else 'No'}")

# Note: This is a simplified example and does not include detailed orbital calculations.

```

### Step 5: Explanation

- **Orbital Propagation**: The `propagate_orbit` function uses numerical integration to simulate how an object's position and velocity change over time due to gravitational forces, particularly from the Sun (simplified here).

- **Close Approach Calculation**: The `compute_close_approach` function calculates when the closest distance between two objects is achieved. In this example, we check if it comes within 0.1 AU of Earth.

### Step 6: Limitations

This code provides a basic framework and does not include advanced orbital mechanics or detailed observational uncertainties required for precise impact probability calculations. For real-world applications, you would need to use more sophisticated methods involving:

- **Keplerian Elements**: Accurate initial conditions.

- **Orbital Uncertainty**: Covariance matrices representing measurement errors.

- **Historical Data Analysis**: Using historical close approaches and collision rates.

### Step 7: Further Reading

To get a detailed impact probability calculation, you might want to explore tools like NASA's Collision Avoidance System (CAS) or use Monte Carlo simulations with realistic orbital uncertainty distributions.

It *strikes* me (Pun Intended) that if I created an AI Agent to follow the CAS Objects that threaten us the most and give it Internet access to all of the Earth's Terrestrial and Space Telescope Sites... It could capture all of the latest Data on Near Earth Objects and feed their specs through the Python3 OIP Program...and call my Cell Phone the minute it spots a problem...it could Text me with either one of two messages:

(1) Pacific Impact IMMINENT...Get To Higher Ground!

Or....

(2) North American Craton Land Mass Impact IMMINENT! BOAKYAG!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
After the first several years of the AI Emergence in the Business and Job Markets... If YOU have been negatively affected by these developments and either "Right Sized" or had your own work and skill set negatively affected... Consider browsing THIS Link and use it as a Powerful Job Search Tool that will allow you to *Play in the AI Sand-Box* and obtain gainful employment within these emergent AI Markets. If even just ONE of US can benefit from looking in this new direction...in REMOTE EMPLOYMENT...then this Thread will become worth reading:

 

Forum Statistics

Threads
24,163
Posts
647,502
Members
20,532
Latest member
brothervilla

Members Online

No members online now.