Fire06 said:
Thanks!
I haven't gotten to go out and shoot yet - been too busy lately and the weather hasn't permitted when I've had free time. I do have a sort of "first look" review though after handling it a good bit and having it broken down to clean and lightly lubricate it for the first time.
The Shield feels good in your hand (or at least mine) with the 7 round magazine that is pictured above, which allows room for a shooter to have all three fingers on the gun. The standard magazine also comes with it and holds 6 rounds, but leaves the little finger with no place to go - not a big deal if you're used to shooting the small guns like the various .380s that have become popular lately. The gun is slim, I think .95 inches, and the gun is also sort of "tall" feeling. It is almost identical in every aspect of size to a Ruger LC9, so for those of you who've handled one of those but not a shield, there's a size comparison. I expect it to have some slight muzzle flip when shooting, but that will be easily countered, or at least helped, with the extended mag for better control. Concealability is great with the standard magazine, but is definitely not a problem with the longer magazine either, as it only adds 1/2" to 3/4" to the height of the gun, just enough for your little finger.
Takedown of the gun is easy and comes down into the expected pieces - slide, barrel, recoil spring, and frame. Field stripping involves simply locking back the slide, pushing down the small sear disengagement (I think it is) lever inside the mag well, rotating the takedown lever down 90 degrees, and then sliding the slide forward and off. Reassembly is exactly the reverse of takedown, obviously, and to re-engage the sear lever simply put a magazine in the gun and check everything for proper function.
Sights are good, just what can be expected from the M&P line - white dot sights that are fully drift adjustable, and the rear sight has a set screw to prevent movement. The rear sights have a nice square opening that when pulling the gun up just seems to naturally be filled with the front sight centered up very easily. My gun has a visual loaded chamber indicator, but there are some with a tactile loaded chamber indicator. My gun also does not have a magazine disconnect, but there are some models which do. I'm not sure about which ones have the tactile indicator and the mag disconnect, I think those are the MA and CA compliant ones.
Now the part that most guys have a beef with - the safety. The shield has a 6.5 pound trigger pull (and from what I can tell it's a nice trigger, I'll know more after I shoot) which is right in line with the small guns with no safety. I see no problems in leaving the safety off to carry the gun because the safety actuates nicely, but it is a stiff actuation. It is also tucked flat against the gun as are the other two levers on the left side, and cannot be easily, if at all, caught on clothing or a holster and unintentionally actuated. It also should not be a problem for the safety to stay off while being carried. Even with wear I don't see this being a problem, but only time will tell. The S&W manual with it, though for legal reasons cannot tell you that you can carry it with the safety off, basically tells the shooter that it is up to him or her to determine the level of safety they are comfortable with, and tiptoes all around saying that you can just leave it off if you wish.
If you've ever seen and handled a full size or compact M&P, then you've basically seen a Shield, but definitely not handled one. Dad has a M&P compact .45, and the guns are nearly identical in features and share a definite familial resemblance. Proportions are somewhat different though, and the grips on the Shield are not interchangeable as are the ones on the regular M&Ps. This is of no consequence, at least to me, however because the Shield's grips are comfortable and fit the hand well.
There you go: a sort of quick review of the Shield's features from a guy new to them. I'll know way more after I shoot it and post up results and a review of how it shoots, any feed failures, what type ammo, grouping at the standard 7-10 yards, etc... That is if you all aren't bored to death by this one.
This is looking like it will make a very nice CCW.