As far as fuel consumption, I would say at best, negligible.trailblazer075 said:Thank you!
The consumption is lower or it there is no change?
the roadie said:I'm going to change the title of this thread to make sure folks don't come here looking for a How-To thread.
This is normal in PARK or NEUTRAL. It is a RPM limiter put there by the designers because there is no good reason to push the engine to high RPM like that except as a test. But they don't care about the owner's doing the test. They worry about dumb owners getting the RPM high in NEUTRAL, then shifting to DRIVE, attempting to make the tires go chirp, and breaking the transmission from the abuse.trailblazer075 said:J have been afraid to return because when the engine started, it did not exceed 3000 rpm munites!
600 RPM is the perfect number.At idle it runs slower I am currently at 600 rpm in park position.
woody79 said:I've been thinking of taking a look at my TB to see what shape its in. My truck is a '08 with 78,000. We got it with around 50,000 on it.
I know it may sound like a stupid question, but do all years of our Trailblazer's suffer from dirty TB's? I'm guessing so as Roadie said GM were cheap and didn't install PCV valve's.
Edit: Also, thanks Roadie for the break down on why its important to clean the TB and what symptoms to look out for. I'm sure a lot of people will find this thread useful.
woody79 said:I've been thinking of taking a look at my TB to see what shape its in. My truck is a '08 with 78,000. We got it with around 50,000 on it.
I know it may sound like a stupid question, but do all years of our Trailblazer's suffer from dirty TB's? I'm guessing so as Roadie said GM were cheap and didn't install PCV valve's.
Edit: Also, thanks Roadie for the break down on why its important to clean the TB and what symptoms to look out for. I'm sure a lot of people will find this thread useful.
ChevyIIfan said:This comment is merely my jaw droppoing. 78k on your '08??? I have 30,500 on my '08..... Best of luck cleaning yours!
trailblazer075 said:To be honest with you, mine too had no problems but finally I saw the dirt well to do so.
I am sure that in 10 years this has never been done!
The only problem that I've had with my truck have spark plugs and ignition coils that I have had to replace because there were only five-cylinder operation.
trailblazer075 said:I must say that since the cleaning of the BODY, my check engine light no longer illuminates.
Yet this is not related?
LennieM said:I cant find any throttle body cleaner in any stores where i live, is it possible to use brakecleaner or carburator cleaner?
LennieM said:I cant find any throttle body cleaner in any stores where i live, is it possible to use brakecleaner or carburator cleaner?
miron said:It appears I will need to clean my TB on my '06 Envoy w/ 117k mi. When it's cool outside, sitting at a light idle, the RPM will periodically drop to around 500RPM and my charging system will drop from 14VDC to 11.5 and the dash lights will dim. Annoying! So now I have a good idea of the issue. This has been going on for a couple of years now. I used to have to drive 20mi round-trip to work and home every day. Did this for eight months so I am pretty sure it contributed to the fouling of the TB. As soon as it warm up a little (I have no garage (sniffle)) I'll do the job, take pics, and let ya'll know the outcome. Wish me luck! Oh, and Happy New Year to you all!
the roadie said:They worry about dumb owners getting the RPM high in NEUTRAL, then shifting to DRIVE, attempting to make the tires go chirp, and breaking the transmission from the abuse. 600 RPM is the perfect number.
the roadie said:The root cause is that the GM designers were cheap, failed to install a normal PCV valve, and the back of the throttle body gets full of sticky gunk from crankcase blowby.
Oh my goodness, I totally agree. Having a 38 year career in electronic system design and support, I've seen it all from the engineer's point of view, with a few years in management where I saw more of the bigger economic picture. I'm guilty of falling back into some stereotypical shorthand in that post you pointed out, and I certainly meant to lay ultimate blame on the management chain who ultimately have to answer to the shareholders. Customers and employees are only two of the three legs that support any public corporation.400Magnum said:Roadie, while you usually give very good technical advise, I have to take exception to your comment about designers. As a former designer at GM, I can tell you that the designers have very little to do with the parts being selected, they are on a short leash from the engineer, who are in turn on a short leash from the program managers, who are on a short leash from the accounting department. The people that control the money have the lion's share of control over how an engine is designed and what can and can't be done.
I just want to set the record straight. Thank you.
You can try, but the procedure was proven by years of success at trailvoy. The back of the throttle body usually looks like a Dodge City spittoon after 30 years of use in the 1800's, which was then put away in a museum, uncleaned, and dried out for the next hundred years. The cleaning process isn't that bad, but you have to take it off and get on the backside and around the knife-edge of the butterfly disk where the sticky buildup interferes with smooth operation. The center of the back of the disk always looks bad, but never needs cleaning like the rest, because it's not interfering. I don't think it would surprise anybody to hear that I don't even bother with the center of the back of the disk. Saves me a minute per cleaning. But I like leaving dirt in hidden places because it bothers the OCD members to read that.400Magnum said:... I was wondering about a revising the cleaning procedure. ...
Yes, ESPECIALLY if the dealers benefit by overcharging for throttle body cleaning and even REPLACEMENT, which is how we've read some owners were abused over the years when they reported erratic idle. There are many items that could have been easily designed for better maintainability, but were not, either due to schedule/economic pressure in the design process or a motivation to throw the dealers a bone by letting them charge more labor hours for long term maintenance. Upper control arm bolts hitting the body sheet metal because nobody checked for interference. HVAC actuators. Thermostat. Spare tire winch. Motor mounts. The list goes on.miron said:Would cost REALLY be the reason for omisson of a semi-vital and proven part?