Perhaps I can weigh in on my opinion WHY GM changed from a replaceable to a non-replaceable fuel filter. In my opinion, fuel filter replacement is the second biggest consumer scam in automobiles today. (The first is nitrogen-filled tires.)
While we ALL have a tendency to tell people, "Replace the fuel filter" when diagnosing almost ANY problem, in a review of these forums as a member since the beginning, I have NEVER found a situation where replacing the fuel filter fixed anything. In fact, in all my years of owning and working on cars, I only found one situation in the last 45 years where replacing the fuel filter fixed the problem.
I think this is why they made it a non-replaceable item - fuel filters rarely need replacing today. In fact, with the history of GM fuel pump failures and how pumps are designed to wear out in 8 to 12 years in normal use, I would venture to say that if you replaced the filter at the same time you replace the pump, you'll be fine.
This is assuming you didn't get a load of bad gas. (Which is VERY rare today.)
There are so many unproven, bullshit, old-wives-tales and junk science out there that we need to be sure this forum provides GOOD and DOCUMENTED advice. In the absence of any specific symptoms of bad gas, I just wish we would stop replacing fuel filters as a possible solution and just keep to the regular maintenance schedules.
It is coincidence but I was just painting my brake callipers and rotor hat and trying to decide if I need to mask off the braking surface on the rotors. I saw SO many people just repeat what their fathers taught them without the hint of scientific evidence to back it up. I just sprayed the rotor hat, avoided the braking surface as much as possible but didn't mask a thing. Anyone who thinks a little bit of paint "contaminates" a brake pad has no clue how they actually work. I did one side at a time, rode the brakes for a minute to het them up and help cure the paint and then did hard stops to see if there was any difference side-to-side. There was none.
Chickenhawk - fighting old-wives-tales and junk science since 1955.