One year summary of PCM4Less tuned PCM

WarGawd

Original poster
Member
Sep 2, 2012
468
I don't get around here much, and leave far too many threads unfinished AFAIC, but I thought it would be helpful and interesting to others to summarize my experience & results over the last year with the PCM tune from PCMforless. I had wanted to post my observations earlier, but felt it would be premature to comment on any change in gas mileage until I had adequate data - by now I have probably forgotten or gotten used to some of the differences, but I'll try to note the things that stand out.

I took possession of my 'Voy July 4 2012 with 170739km on the odometer. I had become familiar with the OS and eventually with GMTNation while I was researching the vehicle prior to purchase. I learned of the PCM tunes and how well regarded the people and products at PCMforless were through this forum. I bought the tuned PCM somewhere around Dec 2012, but never got around to installing it until Apr of 2013. I was mostly hoping for a small improvement in gas mileage, and maybe a little more zest on the performance side. The tune was pretty basic as the truck is stock - the only real input choices I made were for Shift Firmness 2 (the recommended choice), 87 Octane, & No towing. I also gave them my usual elevation but everything else was left as stock or to tuner's choice.

By the time of installation, I had put on 27355km with total fuel consumption of 5328.44L (by receipts) for a calculated consumption rate of 19.48L/100km {16998mi / 1407.6gal / 12.075mpg}. The type of driving I do has remained very consistent since I first bought the truck, with pretty consistent monthly mileage and pretty consistent 65/35 city/highway split. At the time of PCM install, my DIC was indicating 5251.7L of fuel consumed and 26828.8km driven for a calcuted consumption rate of 19.57L/100km, but I had reset the entire DIC just a few days after I picked up the truck and started tracking gas mileage on Fuelly.com, so the minor discrepancy isn't a surprise. The DIC indicated fuel consumption rate at this point was 19.5L/100km, VERY accurate in comparison with both the results above.

Installing the PCM was pretty painless and simple except for a little silicon gasket that I discovered hiding on the intake manifold under my PCM...turns out to have been for the temp sensor I had replaced earlier, but its prescence threw me for a loop for a bit while I tried to figure out where it belonged on the PCM! ;-)

I had to do the standard security relearn, but to date I have not yet done the CASE relearn. Part of that choice was based on erroneous feedback from a mechanic that claimed to have work in a GM dealership shop.
May03LT's video on the process has since clarified that for me but I still haven't gotten around to doing it.

The new PCM messed up my OLM indicator. Prior to install it was at something like 30%, after install it was showing 74% - no big deal, I just manually corrected for it until the next oil change.

I did definitely notice an immediate change in the shift behavior of the tranny. The positive changes were snappier shifts under most throttle conditions and though it did feel like it had a little more power, April is also the time where the weather is starting to get cool but not COLD and I would say the performance felt very much like cool weather behavior prior to the tune (IOW, I can't be sure it was really the PCM change). Around my area though there are a couple very common speed limits (50km/hr and 80 km/hr, roughly 30mph & 50 mph respectively), where under very light throttle applications the 2-3 and 3-4 downshifts seem to be a little "reluctant". I often either have to accelerate a bit more aggressively or just give it a little gas and release the throttle slightly to induce the shift. From some other threads I have read, this may be more tranny related than PCM/torque managment related, so take that one with a grain of salt.

For the first month after installation, I may have played around a little and been more aggressive with my driving as I enjoyed the new behavior, but I drive a LOT and settled down into my "normal" habits fairly soon after.

Now for the measured results: After 1 year with the tune, I have put on another 35190.4 km / 21866.3mi, and used 6926.06 L / 1829.67gal of gas for calculated consumption of 19.68L/100km / 11.951mpg. This winter may have been a little tougher, colder more often and definitely had more snow days where I enjoyed the living hell outta 4wd :biggrin: so I might reasonably expect to have slightly worse gas mileage than the comparable period prior to PCM upgrade. Further, the 1-year data enjoys a bias to better mileage by virtue of having been able to use summer gas blends and less warmups & idling for the roughly 3 months from Apr - July.

Recalculating the data to reflect similar 9 month periods for fairer comparison (July 2012 - Apr 2013 vs July 2013 - Apr 2014) gives this: With the tuned PCM installed I did 25277.7km / 15706.8mi and used 5132.8L / 1355.94gal of gas for calculated consumption of 20.31L/100km / 11.58mpg!!!!!

For those wondering, that gas cost me $8550 in the last 12 months or $6600 in the last 9 months. In 21 months I have driven 62500km / 38800mi on total gas costs of $15100 {$0.24/km or $0.39/mi}, just a little less than 3 times what I paid for the truck :eek::sick::faint: When I think of what I could have done with that......:puke: But with 5 kids I need to transport regularly, as well as a shitload of telescope, camping and camera gear I guess this is the price I gotta pay and I still love the truck.

Anyhow, the bottom line is the tune didn't really help my gas consumption any. Others have had a mild improvement though, and so there may still be factors I'm unaware of at play that are interfering with me getting better results.

That's about all I got...

Cheers folks :smile:
 

Mooseman

Moderator
Dec 4, 2011
25,985
Ottawa, ON
Very good read and interesting. I'm wondering if the slight loss in mileage could be due to the aging of the truck/engine since this was over an extended period of time. For example, if you had not swapped the PCM you would have had similar results? Maybe a last/first month would have been more accurate.

Like you, I found similar results but I had issues at the same time as when I got my tune (plugged cat, bad cam phaser) so I don't have any real data to compare with for MPG.
 
Dec 4, 2011
520
Thank you for your work to keep this type of detail and then report on it.

I also keep a record of mileage and fuel used. With the varieties of weather conditions, driving conditions and just general changes it is extremely difficult to claim (well not so hard) and prove (much harder) any mileage conditions. My 06 Denali 5.3L has about 145000 km on it at this time.

Like you i have a tune however i purchased mine from Wester's garage in Alberta before i knew about PCM of NC. I had run the truck from 2008 until Sept of 2013 and was pleased with both the perceived power increase (non verifiable) and fuel mileage. With -40 days no sense in discussing fuel consumption unless you want to brag about how much you used. The best AVERAGE reading I had was 10.5 L/100 km (this works out to 25 mpg US gal.) This was obtained on a highway trip with practically no city driving and no trailer pulling.

In Sept of 2013 we made a trip of approximately 5000 km in a little over a couple of weeks. Because i had just put new rubber on Wester's said they would correct my tire diameter since it was out about 3%. We tried to get it correct however there seems to be a part of the program that won't allow anyone except GM to correct to Zero off. We got it to around 1% slow and I will have to live with that. After we had done all the correction that was possible i asked if there was anything else i could to to the tune and it was suggested to set it up for Premium fuel (no ethanol and higher octane). It was suggested that better performance and fuel economy would be the result. In addition if i didn't notice any change on the way home he said he would change it back to the original Wester's tune for me. (this was all at no cost to me, where local GM garages had quoted me anywhere from 130.00 to 250.00 to correct the Speedometer)

Since i have my bias about short term results for fuel mileage, and since we had about 5000km to go, i had him change the tune to a Premium fuel only. We drove to the next town (20km) and filled up with premium. The results of combined highway, city, freeway in Sept and the previous 5000 km or so over summer driving (to keep the winter effect out) showed an improved mileage of almost 2 liters/100km. I figured this would if not all mostly offset the increased cost of the premium fuel so i left the Premium tune in. I can always make a trip back to Wester's if i decide to go back.

Still saw the disgusting 21 L/ 100 km readings in the cold weather but that was to be expected. We are on our second 6 months on premium fuel so we will see what happens this spring and summer. I will be able to compare same terrain, and time frames year over year this fall. I would also expect weather conditions to balance out. I will try to remember this thread and report back.

The comparison was only on Regular gas vrs Premium since i didn't check the data from stock to first tune.
 

Harpo

Member
Dec 4, 2011
419
Sweden
Very interesting reading.

But man, you must have something wrong with your Xl.

My Ext is right at 20.3L/100km but that is with my 2 ton caravan behind during summer vacation.:eek::confused:


I am just now hunting down what's causing my milage drop in the last year.
It's been going down from 14,5l/100km to about 17 l/100km.
 

WarGawd

Original poster
Member
Sep 2, 2012
468
Harpo said:
Very interesting reading.

But man, you must have something wrong with your Xl.

My Ext is right at 20.3L/100km but that is with my 2 ton caravan behind during summer vacation.:eek::confused:


I am just now hunting down what's causing my milage drop in the last year.
It's been going down from 14,5l/100km to about 17 l/100km.

I'd be curious to know what rear end you have, and what your city / hwy split is. I have the 3.42, and it definitely prefers a highway cruise to city driving. When I first bought it, the DIC indicated consumption rate for the previous owner was 15.4L/100 with the total consumption maxed out to 9999.9L. My measured or indicated consumption has never been that good, except for trips which were strictly highway miles. For me there's no real trend evident -I bet if I took each of the last 21 monthly averages and plotted them, I would see only the seasonal variation, and comparing each month with the previous pre-tuned result a year prior, those would be pretty close to each other. 2000 miles a month just isn't enough to reliably detect a small change specific to the PCM when other factors vary as much as they do.

@Mooseman, thanx for the comments. Yeah aging could be at play, or maybe just my driving habits have gotten mildly worse without me being aware. I'm not aware of any performance degradation, though those can creep up on you slowly. I guess my main point was that any gas mileage changes arising from any PCM tune are likely to be so small in either direction that they will tend to be masked by other factors and very hard to detect statistically without a LOT more data from any one individual or many more data samples from multiple people.
 

Mooseman

Moderator
Dec 4, 2011
25,985
Ottawa, ON
Definitely these beasts are for long distance cruising with the gearing and larger tanks. On our summer vacation 2012, I managed between 17.5 and 20.2 mpg (actual calculated) with an average of 18.25 mpg. Most was highway between 65 and 75 mph cruise control and A/C on with 4 people and full of baggage and camping gear.

When my cat was plugged, I was getting as bad as 12 mpg and power was terrible. Have you thought of getting a back pressure check or taking out the O2 sensor on the manifold to see if there is an improvement?
 

gmcman

Member
Dec 12, 2011
4,660
I agree something is amiss if you are seeing 12 mpg, I have a hard time averaging below 15. When I see 11-12 mpg I'm dragging a tandem axle trailer with 2 yards of dirt in it.

Wargawd, what is the maintenance history?
 

Harpo

Member
Dec 4, 2011
419
Sweden
I got 3:73 and city/hwy split is like 20/80.

I got a service car so I only use the TB on weekends and vacations and I also have five kid's so we are always fully loaded.
The times I go in it myself only I could count on one hands fingers:no:
 

igorlak2

Member
Apr 10, 2014
1
Mooseman said:
Very good read and interesting. I'm wondering if the slight loss in mileage could be due to the aging of the truck/engine since this was over an extended period of time. For example, if you had not swapped the PCM you would have had similar results? Maybe a last/first month would have been more accurate.

Like you, I found similar results but I had issues at the same time as when I got my tune (plugged cat, bad cam phaser) so I don't have any real data to compare with for MPG.

How would you check for plugged cat, bad cam phaser?

thanks
 

WarGawd

Original poster
Member
Sep 2, 2012
468
gmcman said:
I agree something is amiss if you are seeing 12 mpg, I have a hard time averaging below 15. When I see 11-12 mpg I'm dragging a tandem axle trailer with 2 yards of dirt in it.

Wargawd, what is the maintenance history?

At time of purchase the maintenance history was unknown, except for those items that the selling dealer had been forced to address himself such as replacing a cracked exhaust manifold. I'm pretty sure the front O[SUB]2[/SUB] sensor was replaced at that time. I personally have cleaned the TB a few times, changed the plugs, changed & upgraded all fluids to full synthetic. The tranny got a full flush and new filter when I did that. My mileage between oil change intervals averages around 12000km, with less than 1L consumed in any of those intervals. I have replaced the stepper motors, a bad thermostat and the temp sensor, a wonky idler pulley, accessory belt, air filter. I have no noticeable other performance issues nor any codes, intermittent or otherwise.

So as far as I can tell performance is ok. But this was supposed to be a thread about what others may expect from a PCM tune, and if the consensus is that I should be chasing issues related to poor mileage, I should take that off to another thread. Next time I get a chance I'll do some data logging, and pull the O[SUB]2[/SUB] sensor to see if I can pick up on any changes.

Cheers :smile:
 

Mooseman

Moderator
Dec 4, 2011
25,985
Ottawa, ON
igorlak2 said:
How would you check for plugged cat, bad cam phaser?

thanks

If you remove the upstream O2 sensor and take it for a drive (noisy) and feel the power is up, then the cat is plugged. Or get a backpressure test done. For the phaser, you would get codes (I had P1345) as well as a disabled cruise control.
 

Playsinsnow

Member
Nov 17, 2012
9,727
Mileage will change with air temperature. I've also noticed the TB seems to LOVE fall and spring because of summer blend gas and mild air temps. So trying to figure out if my avg of 1.8mpgs increase was due to seasonal gas or increase in air temp to above the freezing point is difficult without more controlled data. Add a tune to the mix and there is yet another variable that effects the "increase/decrease" in mpgs from day one.


Stock at 133k miles with K&N and still see same mileage as day one 7 years ago at 17k. :twocents:
 

KNBlazer

Member
Feb 8, 2012
811
didn't read most of the thread, but if you haven't replaced O2 sensor, I would do that first... I had been averaging 14.5 mpg for the past few years, this past December I finally got around to installing o2 sensor, I am now averaging 16mpg.... '04 TB Ext....I used AcDelco and purchased it through Amazon...
 

iowarider

Member
Jan 17, 2014
8
I currently drive a 2005 trailbalzer lt. I have thought of purchasing one of tunes like yours. For what its worth, I have a decent statistics background,as the saying goes old teachers never die, they just lose there class. pcforless and the others can claim 10% mileage gains, proving it is very difficult. There are so many variables involved. Not the least of which is our right foot. The amount of increase is relatively small. Yours is the best data I have seen collected. Just as you said, can't really detect the mph, or kpm gain. The tune may very well make things run smoother and even quicker due to shift point changes. Gains in fuel mileage/kilometers It depends is the best that can be said.

Thanks for the great article and the impressive data collections, great great read.
 

HARDTRAILZ

Moderator
Nov 18, 2011
49,665
Nice write up
 

Forum Statistics

Threads
23,659
Posts
641,697
Members
19,085
Latest member
ChevyCG

Members Online