dkvasnicka
Member
I'm one of those who threw in a K&N but are having second thoughts... I've read almost everything that can be searched on the net on K&Ns before I put it there but decided to go with it because I had a (subjective) very good experience with it in my turbocharged V6 Saab 9-5. Forced induction engines like airflow.
However I'm now not so sure it's worth it. What I would love to know is whether the airflow is really bigger enough to e.g. help the torque converter stay locked up longer in hills simply because the engine needs to work less in order to suck the air in... Some people report that (or staying in higher gears longer).
Is the throttle body open enough for the increased airflow to actually matter in regular driving? Can it be really that harder for the engine to breathe with the paper filter?
Some people report lower MPG, some higher
I think I'll just put in the old filter and try it for some period of time.
However I'm now not so sure it's worth it. What I would love to know is whether the airflow is really bigger enough to e.g. help the torque converter stay locked up longer in hills simply because the engine needs to work less in order to suck the air in... Some people report that (or staying in higher gears longer).
Is the throttle body open enough for the increased airflow to actually matter in regular driving? Can it be really that harder for the engine to breathe with the paper filter?
Some people report lower MPG, some higher
I think I'll just put in the old filter and try it for some period of time.