- May 15, 2012
- 122
I should have phrased it differently. NOT brand new like off the lot. I think it has 3,800 miles if I remember correctly. I was told to be careful with it but to have fun.IllogicTC said:Brand new, eh? And you're trying to post 0-60 times without going through engine break-in? In that case I'll be instead guessing the amount of time before your vehicle goes back to the dealer for major repairs.
I admittedly enjoy the retro-styling. When they first reintroduced the Charger it looked exactly like the Chrysler 300C with a Dodge cross-grille on the front. So stupid...amweaver47 said:I should have phrased it differently. NOT brand new like off the lot. I think it has 3,800 miles if I remember correctly. I was told to be careful with it but to have fun.
It's not MOPARnation where I'm sitting, more like off topic pictures. I figured we would have some people that appreciate performance without HAVING to have a bowtie. I don't even like Dodges but I still respect the performance of the Challenger.
Christ I don't think I've ever been flamed so hard. Back to the drawing board on thread starting for me.
I prefer the styling before it was retro even more. Circa 1970 for me. Charger is just a car, nothing more nothing less. My only complaint about the Challenger, between your passenger headrest and the foot-wide c pillar, its very difficult to see out of that side of the car. First thing I noticed backing out of the owners driveway. You could easily back out in front of traffic.IllogicTC said:I admittedly enjoy the retro-styling. When they first reintroduced the Charger it looked exactly like the Chrysler 300C with a Dodge cross-grille on the front. So stupid...