This is more of a vent than a question I guess...
I think the car has had a knock for about a month. It's my stepdaughter's car and I just have not had any time to look into it at all. I'm still finishing resolving my 97x's issues. We bought an extended powertrain warranty on my stepdaughter's car, a 2004 Mazda 6. There was nothing wrong with the car when we bought it from the stealership.
The car had been running rough for a few weeks and nothing bad enough to warrant immediate attention. A few spirts of what sounded like a misfire/rough idle. I test drove it but, did not hear/feel any misfires.
One day the car would not start in the parking lot at her work. I was still at work and towing was covered by AAA. So, we had it towed to the dealer for troubleshooting, since we knew it had a warranty for the drivetrain. It ended up being a dead battery. Since it was covered by the extended warranty we had them inspect the vehicle since it was covered.
They said they found a P-304, no other codes were mentioned in the report. My GF/Fiance had told them that the CAT was bad. The mechanic proceeded to tell her that because of the misfire of ONE cylinder. There was extra fuel passing by the O2 sensor (that hadn't been burnt) and was the bad CAT code, that I have never even seen and don't know who told either of the girls, that it was an issue.
Am I right to assume that IF extra fuel was passing by the upstream O2 sensor, a lean/rich (I assume lean) condition would have been seen by the upstream O2 sensor? And possibly then the bad CAT code given by the downstream O2?
The only codes that were written down in the report of the mechanic were P-0304, misfire on cylinder 4. When I scanned it the day it got back from the stealership. I had ONLY two codes, P0022 ("A" Camshaft Position - Timing Over-Retarded Bank 2) and P2092 ("A" Camshaft Position Sensor Acuator Control Low Bank 2). The codes were not cleared but I did not see after 5 or 6 restarts any misfires.
I "assume" that I should have seen two different codes IF that mechanic was correct in his assumptions, one for the misfire and another for lean/rich O2?
me"
I think the car has had a knock for about a month. It's my stepdaughter's car and I just have not had any time to look into it at all. I'm still finishing resolving my 97x's issues. We bought an extended powertrain warranty on my stepdaughter's car, a 2004 Mazda 6. There was nothing wrong with the car when we bought it from the stealership.
The car had been running rough for a few weeks and nothing bad enough to warrant immediate attention. A few spirts of what sounded like a misfire/rough idle. I test drove it but, did not hear/feel any misfires.
One day the car would not start in the parking lot at her work. I was still at work and towing was covered by AAA. So, we had it towed to the dealer for troubleshooting, since we knew it had a warranty for the drivetrain. It ended up being a dead battery. Since it was covered by the extended warranty we had them inspect the vehicle since it was covered.
They said they found a P-304, no other codes were mentioned in the report. My GF/Fiance had told them that the CAT was bad. The mechanic proceeded to tell her that because of the misfire of ONE cylinder. There was extra fuel passing by the O2 sensor (that hadn't been burnt) and was the bad CAT code, that I have never even seen and don't know who told either of the girls, that it was an issue.
Am I right to assume that IF extra fuel was passing by the upstream O2 sensor, a lean/rich (I assume lean) condition would have been seen by the upstream O2 sensor? And possibly then the bad CAT code given by the downstream O2?
The only codes that were written down in the report of the mechanic were P-0304, misfire on cylinder 4. When I scanned it the day it got back from the stealership. I had ONLY two codes, P0022 ("A" Camshaft Position - Timing Over-Retarded Bank 2) and P2092 ("A" Camshaft Position Sensor Acuator Control Low Bank 2). The codes were not cleared but I did not see after 5 or 6 restarts any misfires.
I "assume" that I should have seen two different codes IF that mechanic was correct in his assumptions, one for the misfire and another for lean/rich O2?
me"